What Do Musicians Want From Editions?
How can music editions support both scholars and performers? A new workshop explores clearer, performer-friendly editions that make early music easier to read, play and enjoy.
How should music editions serve performers as well as scholars today? With high-resolution facsimiles now ubiquitous, scholarly editions act less as stand-ins for sources and more as analytical tools, often burdened by apparatus that impedes rehearsal. In this Edition Hack-Day workshop, ensembles iuchair and Cantus Firmus tested unseen editions that embody different editorial philosophies.
Subsequent discussions centre on trust, clarity, rhythmic guidance, and the role of the editor and editorial relationship, finding that neat layout, spacing, and succinct prefaces matter. Overloading a performer with variants and apparatus does not aid performance. In so doing, performers ask editors to pick a side where necessary while keeping options accessible.
The workshop identifies two problems – one-way editorial models, and a homogenisation of early music practice – and proposes richer, performer-aware digital editions that can encourage diversity without sacrificing usability.
Credits
- Investigator and presenter: Dr Joshua Stutter (Teaching Associate in Digital Humanities at the University of Sheffield)
- Contributor: Katy Cooper
- Contributor: Ava Dinwoodie
- Contributor: Edward Marshall
- Contributor: Josh McCullough
- Contributor: Alasdair Robertson
- Video production and editing: Eilidh Riddell
